tisdag 23 juni 2026

Ett försök att rätta till vad som gick fel i Nicea

 The Jerusalem Affirmation of the Nicene Faith

By Dr. Jürgen Bühler, ICEJ President

Last week, the ICEJ’s Jerusalem Summit included a track that looked back at Church History and especially the Council of Nicaea of 325 AD. This church council issued the Nicene Creed to unify the expanding Christian world around the divinity of Jesus, but also steered the Church away from its Jewish roots. Here are excerpts from the presentation on Nicaea by ICEJ President Dr. Jürgen Bühler at the Jerusalem Summit.

The Council of Nicaea was convened 1700 years ago largely to resolve the dispute within the early Church over the divinity of Jesus. They responded by formulating the Nicene Creed, which adopted the concept of the Trinity as a counter to the teachings of Arius.

The emperor Constantine also summoned the Council to unify the holidays, and especially to settle on a date for all Christians to celebrate Easter. I do believe that, within the motivations of Constantine, there was a good dose of antisemitism. This spirit may not have been so present among all the Church fathers gathered there. We actually do not know, because there are no minutes from the Council of Nicaea, and they met for three long months.

But when Constantine later declared to the churches a new date for Easter, he stated the following in his synodal letter: “When the question relative to the sacred festival of Easter arose, it was universally thought that it would be convenient that all should keep the feast on one day. For what could be more beautiful and more desirable than to see this festival, through which we receive the hope of immortality, celebrated by all with one accord, and in the same manner? It was declared to be particularly unworthy for this, the holiest of all festivals, to follow the customs and the calculation of the Jews, who had soiled their hands with the most fearful of crimes, and whose minds are blinded.”

This was the second ecumenical council in Church history. The first council was right here in Jerusalem, recorded in Acts chapter 15. In that council, the gates were opened wide for Gentiles to join the Church. The big question was: What should we do with all of these believers in Yeshua who are not Jewish? Should they get circumcised or eat kosher? And the council agreed all they need to do is believe in Yeshua, and to be culturally respectful to Jews, along with observing some Noahide regulations outlined by the council. But they widely opened the doors for us as Gentiles.

What happened at Nicaea, and at other councils soon after, was they made it almost impossible for Jews to join the Church. They could not celebrate their Jewish holidays anymore, go to synagogues, or use matzah bread to celebrate Easter. And you must not call it Passover. So, there was a complete rejection of everything Jewish, and this started at Nicaea. This was not so much by what was said at Nicaea, but by what was deliberately omitted, to separate the Church from any Jewish context.

Then there were several councils that followed which slightly altered the language of the Nicene Creed. So, there is a precedent for the Creed to undergo minor changes, with its core tenets remaining intact.

Jerusalem Affirmation

Now, the affirmed Creed that we want to release here today does not have a global magisterium, but we did run it through the magisterium of the ICEJ, through key leaders and respected theologians in our movement, and our Board of Trustees.

In this “Jerusalem Affirmation of the Nicene Faith”, we left the original Nicene Creed as it is, because it rightly affirms the divinity of Yeshua. But we felt that here in Jerusalem we need to affirm the humanity of Jesus as a Jew, which was essential to establishing his credentials as the promised Messiah. This Affirmation also aims to restore our appreciation for the uniquely central role of Israel, the Patriarchs and the Hebrew Scriptures in birthing and nourishing the Christian faith from its inception. Every new phrase added in this Affirmation is firmly grounded in New Testament texts and truths.

Ultimately, this Affirmation seeks to reaffirm the Church’s historic commitment to the Jewish people, thereby rejecting antisemitism in all its forms and encouraging a biblically based understanding of the relationship between the Church, Israel and the Jewish people.

We invite you to join us by signifying your agreement with the Jerusalem Affirmation of the Nicene Faith. This is especially needed today to restore to the wider Church a more biblical view of the rightful place Israel and the Jewish people held and still hold in God’s redemptive purposes.

Please sign and share the Jerusalem Affirmation of the Nicene Faith at: https://jerusalemsummit.icej.org/affirmation-sign

tisdag 16 juni 2026

ECI månadsrapport

 ECI månadsrapport

- Europa blundar för Iran

- Ingenting nytt under solen: dagens antisionism är återanvänd sovjetisk propaganda

- Är biblisk läskunnighet bästa motmedlet mot antisemitism?

- ECI inspirerar partnerorganisationer i New York

-ECI:s unga ledare gick med i solidaritetsinitiativ vid Eurovision 2026

söndag 14 juni 2026

Intervju med premiärministerkandidat

Om man är intresserad av dagsläget i Israel skall man läsa intervjun med en av premiärministerkandidaterna i valet i höst, Naftali Bennett.

 Bennett to ToI: ‘We’re at an existential moment. Another four years with this government, we won’t have a society’

With US and Iran set to sign deal, former and would-be PM also denounces Netanyahu’s Iran strategy, reliance on ‘protracted wars’; slams the Haredi ‘state within a state’ as causing ‘slow-motion national suicide’

Speaking with ToI on Thursday at the campaign headquarters of Together, the new, merged party he now leads with former prime minister Yair Lapid, Bennett said Israel is facing “an existential moment,” and warned that another term under the current government would leave the country without a functioning economy, society or international position. “Another four years with this government, we won’t have an economy, we won’t have a society,” he charged. “The Haredi issue will just crash us all. We won’t have an international standing anywhere. We have to act now.”

S-gruppens bojkott av Israel

 Adressen som vädjar till S-gruppen att återta sitt beslut att bojkotta israeliska produkter har överlämnats.

Reaktionerna från S-gruppens ledning  visar på stor okunskap om världsläget och en ovilja att ta till sig fakta. S-gruppen följer inte ens sina egna regler vid beslutet. S- gruppens bojkottbeslut handlar i grund och botten bara om Israelhat, om man väljer att säga det rent ut.

Här diskuterar man överlämnandet och S-gruppens underliga agerande:

Israel-studio 114: Adressin luovutus paljasti S-ryhmän Israel-allergian


fredag 12 juni 2026

Veckans David Horovitz

 The bully and the schemer

Trump and Netanyahu may deserve each other. But in the battle against Iran and its proxies, and in the struggle for the democratic, law-abiding, Jewish-majority Israel, we need better


...Which brings us back to Trump’s renewed dissing of Netanyahu.

Like any playground bully, the US president is turning on what he perceives as a weak and vulnerable target, while obsequiously cozying up to what he sees as more dangerous aggressors.

While publicly declaring that Netanyahu will do what he’s told, he repeatedly praises the mass-murdering leaders of Iran as reasonable, rational and “very smart,” and on Sunday even hailed the new leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, for his “bravery” in ostensibly managing to lead Iran despite having been “pretty badly injured” in the war’s initial Israeli air strikes.

The self-styled great deal-maker appears to be catastrophically out of his depth in negotiating with Iran, employing a non-strategy that might best be described as a mixture of threats, bluster and capitulation. He is seeking assurances that the regime won’t seek nuclear weapons as though any such pledges are of value, relenting on the imperative for a complete, permanent halt to Iranian uranium enrichment, and lately asserting that removing Iran’s stockpile of near-weapons-grade uranium is not really necessary because it is “entombed.”

All this as he implores Tehran to agree to an initial framework deal to get Hormuz reopened, while pushing off all the nuclear weapons-related issues for later negotiations — negotiations in which he would have little leverage because he will have signed an accord committing to the permanent end of the war.

måndag 8 juni 2026

YLE vilseleder människor

 Jag får YLE:s finskspråkiga nyhetsbrev varje morgon. Där kollar jag rubrikerna för att se om något speciellt inträffat.

Idag kunde jag (liksom många andra) läsa att "Israel  slog till på olika håll i Iran, explosioner har hörts i Teheran".  ("Israel iski eri puolille Irania, räjähdyksiä kuultu Teheranissa")

Verkligheten är att Iran igår kväll attackerade Israel med ett tiotal ballistiska missiler. Israel har svarat på attacken.

YLE fortsätter med sin linje som den hållit i tiotals år, att rapportera Israels svar på en attack, den må vara från Iran, Hamas eller Hizbollah, som början på konflikten.

Detta sätta att rapportera har burit frukt. Det finns nu bland befolkningen ett utbrett Israelhat som baserar sig på okunskap och felaktig information.

Rubriken på nätsidan har nu ändrats:

Israel iski eri puolille Irania, Iran teki Israeliin toisen ohjusiskujen sarjan


Trump ties Israel’s hands, as the partnership that went to war 100 days ago collapses

All-clear for Jerusalem area; IDF says all Iranian missiles intercepted this morning

Iran fires missiles at Israel for first time in two months; Trump tells Netanyahu not to retaliate

Trump faller in i den allmänna kören: Irans attack är inget problem för fredsförhandlingarna men om Israel svarar blir det problem. Det är ett förvridet sätt att tänka och skulle knappast förväntas av någon annan är Israel.

Why Israel could not let Iran’s missile attack go unanswered - analysis

Had Israel allowed the attack without response, the message to Tehran would have been pretty clear. Hezbollah could continue ignoring any ceasefire, attacking Israel and its soldiers at will, and any Israeli response to Hezbollah could be framed by Tehran as a provocation, allowing Iran to fire directly at Israel while assuming that American diplomatic pressure would keep Jerusalem’s hands tied.

söndag 7 juni 2026

Judehat i Finland - YLE artikel

YLE (finska) har publicerat en artikel med intervjuer som beskriver judehatet i Finland.

- Judarna i Finland började dölja sin judiska identitet efter att kriget i Gaza gjorde omgivningen mera hotfull.

- Judarna mötet antisemitism speciellt på sociala medier men också ansikte mot ansikte. De görs ansvariga för Israels agerande.

- Enligt de intervjuade är antisemitism också en del av vänsterns retorik. Israel jämförs till exempel med Nazi Tyskland.

-Judarna är rädda att utsättas för våldsdåd och vid den judiska synagogan i Helsingfors har säkerhetsåtgärderna skärpts.


 Juutalaisvihaa Suomessa: ”Minua kutsuttiin vi*** jutkuksi”

Juutalaiset alkoivat piilottaa taustaansa, kun ilmapiiri Suomessa kuumeni Gazan sodan aikana. Yle tapasi Suomen juutalaisia.