Historieförfalskning i media

Jesus var palestinier och judarna har ingen koppling till Tempelberget, det är påståenden som man fått läsa i välkända tidningar den senaste tiden.
But Jesus, born in Bethlehem, was most likely a Palestinian man with dark skin.
New York Times publicerade en insändare med påståendet att Jesus var en palestinsk man. Det lär vara Yasser Arafat som var först med det påståendet som numera upprepas av andra palestinska ledare för att försöka skapa en palestinsk historia i landet.

NYT Op-Ed: Jesus ‘Was Most Likely a Palestinian Man’ (Honest Reporting)
There’s no problem in questioning the widespread depiction of Jesus as white. There is, however, a significant problem in questioning whether he was Jewish, as a recent New York Times op-ed does.
...Questioning how Jesus is depicted is reasonable enough, but labeling him a “Palestinian” is either historical ignorance or the continuation of centuries of attempts to de-Judaize Jesus. In recent times, Jews have faced concerted attempts to supplant Jewish identity and rewrite the history of Jews in the historic Land of Israel in an attempt to undermine Israel’s legitimacy, with the Palestinian people attempting to co-opt Jesus as one of their number.

WAS JESUS A PALESTINIAN AND WHY WOULD CONGRESSWOMAN ILHAN OMAR CARE?
Congresswoman Ilhan Omar:  “Don’t they (Christians) know Jesus was a Palestinian?”



I The Guardian skriver Mick Dumper om Tempelberget som en av de heligaste platserna för muslimerna men inte med ett ord nämner han att den är den heligaste platsen för judarna.

Academic Denies Jewish History on Temple Mount  (Honest Reporting)
Writing in The Guardian, academic Mick Dumper states that the Jewish historical presence on the Temple Mount is merely an “increasingly strident claim.” He also believes that: “Flushed with his electoral victory, and politically tooled-up with US support for his annexationist dreams, Netanyahu has the Islamic sites of Jerusalem in his line of fire. He exhibits all the hallmarks of a politician about to go rogue.”

... Clearly Dumper is not a professor of history or archaeology. It’s undeniable that there were two Jewish temples on the site. This is not an “increasingly strident claim” as Dumper says, but is an established and provable fact.

No wonder Dumper cannot bring himself to acknowledge that the Temple Mount is Judaism’s holiest site. In the best traditions of Palestinian extremists, he denies that there was ever a Jewish temple there at all.