Finland röstade igen för en FN-resolution som fördömer Israel. Jag har inte längre ord för att beskriva Finlands utrikespolitiska ledning. Totalt inkompetent, det snällaste jag kommer på.
Resolutionen stöder sig bland annat på ICJ:s rådgivande uttalande. Mer om det kan man läsa här: Avvikande åsikt från vice ordförande Sebutinde del 1
Läs också : Finland i "krig" mot Israel
Några plock från resolutionen:
7. Demands that Israel, the occupying Power, comply strictly with its
obligations under international law, including as reflected in the advisory opinion of
the International Court of 19 July 2024, including to bring an end to its unlawful
presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, as rapidly as possible, to cease
immediately all new settlement activities and to evacuate all settlers from the
Occupied Palestinian Territory, and to put an end to its unlawful acts, including by
repealing all legislation and measures creating or maintaining the unlawful situation,
inter alia, those which discriminate against the Palestinian people, as well as all
measures aimed at modifying the demographic composition of any parts of the
Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem;
8. Rejects any attempt at demographic or territorial change in the Gaza Strip,
including any actions that reduce the territory of Gaza, stresses that the Gaza Strip
constitutes an integral part of the Palestinian territory occupied in 1967, and reaffirms
the vision of the two-State solution, with the Gaza Strip as part of the Palestinian
State;
9. Recalls the principle of the inadmissibility of the acquisition of land by
force and therefore the illegality of the annexation of any part of the Occupied
Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, which constitutes a breach of
international law, undermines the viability of the two-State solution and challenges
the prospects for the achievement of a peaceful settlement and of just, lasting and
comprehensive peace;
10. Stresses the need, in particular, for an immediate halt to all settlement
activities, land confiscation and home demolitions, for the pursuit of measures to
ensure accountability, and for the release of prisoners and an end to arbitrary arrests
and detentions;
11. Also stresses the need for respect for and preservation of the territorial
unity, contiguity and integrity of all the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East
Jerusalem;
UN’s diplomatic failure: Why the two-state solution won’t bring peace to Israel – editorial
"Vansinne är att göra samma sak upprepade gånger och förvänta sig olika resultat", påstås Albert Einstein en gång ha sagt.
The two-state solution, long the UN’s focus, consistently fails due to Palestinian leadership’s refusal to recognize Israel and ongoing corruption and incitement. Instead of addressing these issues, the UN has acted as an enabler.
The truth is stark: the two-state solution has become a diplomatic euphemism for maintaining the status quo. While Yang stressed dialogue, he conspicuously omits any serious critique of the Palestinian Authority’s kleptocratic governance or Hamas’s terrorist regime in Gaza. No state should be expected to negotiate under fire, yet Israel is routinely pressured to do so as rockets fall on its cities and its citizens are slaughtered.
Yang’s comments praising the Palestinian struggle and decrying Israeli actions betray a glaring bias. While he stresses the importance of dialogue, he omits the fact that Israel has faced unrelenting attacks. The UNGA’s tendency to vilify Israel while excusing Palestinian extremism makes any serious discussion about peace a farce..."
